Nothing to say...Title says all...
What's your fav. Assembler?
Started By
H@CK3R_ADI
, May 26 2013 03:10 PM
33 replies to this topic
#2
karcrack
-
- Moderator
-
-
Reputation: 343Very Good
- 303 posts
Advanced Member
Posted 26 May 2013 - 03:45 PM
FASM/NASM
- x58 and iCode like this
(PGP ID 0xCC050E77)
ASM, C, C++, VB6... skilled [malware] developer
#3
Posted 26 May 2013 - 05:36 PM
that's a stupid question... assemblers are very primitive tools... there's no real difference... but I'd say "FASM" for a powerful macro preprocessor...
#4
iCode
-
- Loyalist
-
-
Reputation: 276Very Good
- 283 posts
Intermediate Member
Posted 27 May 2013 - 12:00 AM
FASM for suree
#5
Hess
Contributor
-
- Loyalist
-
-
Reputation: 765Excellent
- 2,817 posts
Intelligence Service
- LocationBelgrade
Contributor
Posted 27 May 2013 - 12:07 AM
Old Skool , MASM32/64. 
- hounded, Coldzer0 and Tony like this
Meet me here: http://www.voa.mod.gov.rs/en/
#6
Posted 27 May 2013 - 04:29 AM
there's some
that is possible with FASM preprocessor...- BlackArray, DualCoder and iCode like this
#7
DavidF
-
- Associate
-
-
Reputation: 58Good
- 71 posts
Member
- LocationPoland
Posted 27 May 2013 - 12:56 PM
TASM16/TASM32 and MASM32/MASM64
#9
karcrack
-
- Moderator
-
-
Reputation: 343Very Good
- 303 posts
Advanced Member
Posted 28 May 2013 - 12:02 AM
LeFF, on 27 May 2013 - 04:29 AM, said:
there's some
that is possible with FASM preprocessor...
There's even more crazy shit but FASM does not document properly compile-time macros... :/
(PGP ID 0xCC050E77)
ASM, C, C++, VB6... skilled [malware] developer
#10
Hess
Contributor
-
- Loyalist
-
-
Reputation: 765Excellent
- 2,817 posts
Intelligence Service
- LocationBelgrade
Contributor
Posted 28 May 2013 - 07:39 AM
Haha karcrack , it is correct , sometimes small thing is missing which prevents You from good , working executable. There is a small tool on masm site which can decrease already small executable by removing unnecessary info from masm32 (this is where it works) executable , and , I was wondering: "What else can be removed from such small executable?" :S And got answer after running it via command line on compiled executable , few kbs are disappeared ! ? :S How and what , it wasn't explained , which is more confusing ! :S
Meet me here: http://www.voa.mod.gov.rs/en/
#12
Indy
-
- Banned
-
-
Reputation: 41Fair
- 71 posts
Banned
Posted 08 June 2013 - 06:53 PM
fasm - exclusively for students. On it there is no difficult codes. Only lab work's 
#13
Hess
Contributor
-
- Loyalist
-
-
Reputation: 765Excellent
- 2,817 posts
Intelligence Service
- LocationBelgrade
Contributor
Posted 08 June 2013 - 08:00 PM
And masm , students do not know much about it ! 
Meet me here: http://www.voa.mod.gov.rs/en/
#14
Indy
-
- Banned
-
-
Reputation: 41Fair
- 71 posts
Banned
Posted 09 June 2013 - 05:04 AM
nt kernel is written on masm. Also all viruses. How to use the ms linker(to build obj'cts) in fasm ?
- hounded and Hess like this
#15
Coldzer0
-
- Members
-
-
Reputation: 42Fair
- 38 posts
Member
Posted 09 June 2013 - 10:40 AM
My Lovely (MASM 
) / FASM
#16
Posted 09 June 2013 - 01:53 PM
Quote
How to use the ms linker(to build obj'cts) in fasm ?
lol! as for windows fasm can output PE and PE+, and also COFF, MS COFF and MS64 COFF... ms linker links MS/MS64 COFF format, GCC linker links COFF...
- karcrack and Hess like this
#18
Indy
-
- Banned
-
-
Reputation: 41Fair
- 71 posts
Banned
Posted 09 June 2013 - 08:43 PM
LeFF
I asked about the object files 
For example link my loader(.obj, .pdb) -> epic fail ?
- Hess likes this
#19
Posted 10 June 2013 - 04:14 AM
Quote
I asked about the object files
For example link my loader(.obj, .pdb) -> epic fail ?
what? COFF is the object file format for GCC, MS/MS64 COFF is the object file format for MSVC... I've already told you:
Quote
ms linker links MS/MS64 COFF format, GCC linker links COFF...
Quote
nt kernel is written on masm. Also all viruses
all viruses? ELF-viruses are mostly written in GAS or NASM or FASM... 
#20
Hess
Contributor
-
- Loyalist
-
-
Reputation: 765Excellent
- 2,817 posts
Intelligence Service
- LocationBelgrade
Contributor
Posted 10 June 2013 - 08:49 AM
I am afraid that You're incorrect Indy on virii's as I've seen in wild writen them in various languages and kits also , Stux.NET is completely written in .NET , how this looks to You ? And , that was the most powerful industry made rootkit ! It targeted nuclear facilities in Iran.
Meet me here: http://www.voa.mod.gov.rs/en/
