Hackhound Crypter 2012
#21
Posted 12 December 2012 - 10:06 PM
sorry for my stupid english :S like Caveman. hahaha
#22
Posted 12 December 2012 - 11:22 PM
#23
Posted 12 December 2012 - 11:34 PM

#24
Posted 13 December 2012 - 05:02 AM
Keep in mind that some rats need EOF checked to work, may try it with eof checked again.

#25
Posted 13 December 2012 - 03:07 PM
but we need to devlope our self
we have Brain
Fuk The Priv
we must share
dont make Crypter >> but make a video Show as how to make it
#26
Posted 13 December 2012 - 03:24 PM
a video on how to fud crypters is that what you are asking for?
and welcome to hackhound Rocko

#28
Posted 14 December 2012 - 08:12 PM
#30
Posted 16 December 2012 - 04:31 PM
This crypter uses old technology for crypting, same as 2005 crypters.
Elite coders are nowadays using another approach to crpyt 100% Undetected. PM me if you need the trick. TIPS: you dont need to code for normal processor codes

#31
Posted 16 December 2012 - 11:31 PM
'droopyar', on 16 Dec 2012 - 4:31 PM, said:
Hi,
This crypter uses old technology for crypting, same as 2005 crypters.
Elite coders are nowadays using another approach to crpyt 100% Undetected. PM me if you need the trick. TIPS: you dont need to code for normal processor codes
I would like to know more about that. Very interesting..
#32
Posted 17 December 2012 - 01:32 AM
'droopyar', on 16 Dec 2012 - 4:31 PM, said:
Hi,
This crypter uses old technology for crypting, same as 2005 crypters.
Elite coders are nowadays using another approach to crpyt 100% Undetected. PM me if you need the trick. TIPS: you dont need to code for normal processor codes
i woud like to know about that ...
#33
Posted 20 December 2012 - 12:57 AM
#34
Posted 21 December 2012 - 04:58 AM
#35
Posted 11 March 2013 - 05:04 PM
excellent very nice ; )
#36
Posted 03 May 2013 - 04:03 AM
wow cool, good job man!
#37
Posted 03 May 2013 - 08:40 PM
Well , each crypter is sooner or later rated as Win32.TR.Dropper. That's for it. Tip: Try VB Reformer 2012 or VB Decompiler.
#38
Posted 20 May 2013 - 08:03 PM
Thanks buddy!
#39
Posted 22 May 2013 - 06:52 AM
As for .NET executables , it will be very hard to make VB6 compatible for example with VB.NET , as .NET executables need framework , and it could be done if it's dropped to hdd , otherwise , from memory , very very hard. And there is yet another problem , VB6 is from 1998 , and .NET came in 2003 officially.
Unless he makes with .NET framework 1.1 which is unusable these days.