If you login again and scan file you won't get that error (me thinks
)
HackHound Scanner 2.0
Started By
BullDog
, Jul 01 2013 12:20 AM
44 replies to this topic
#21
Ravage
-
- Administrators
-
-
Reputation: 455Very Good
- 580 posts
Advanced Member
Posted 02 July 2013 - 02:49 PM
We are aware of this issue and trying to solve it. Guess its happening the first scan only.
If you login again and scan file you won't get that error (me thinks)
If you login again and scan file you won't get that error (me thinks
)
#22
Posted 02 July 2013 - 02:49 PM
I tried scanning a CG excel server..I get this error..No Readout!
Interesting, Ravage has the same problem sometimes. I can't reproduce it unfortunately.
For now, just try again and it should work.
I will investigate that error later, together with Ravage.
Thank you for reporting.
#23
Posted 02 July 2013 - 02:55 PM
It is working..This is nice..Great Job Fellas!
.
File Name: testcgserver.exe File Size: 402432 Bytes md5: 0bed1b6eb51c3ce1f587306f25b2ff7b sha1: 28ffd700a2faf3fd10a6877a9fd3b9dc3c82b22e Scan Date: 02/07/2013 - 10:56 Status: Infected Detection Rate: 17/35
-x_h0rr0r_x
#24
Posted 02 July 2013 - 04:53 PM
Is anyone still able to reproduce that error x_h0rr0r_x mentioned? Unfortunately neither Ravage nor me can reproduce it, so it's difficult to fix it.
#25
Posted 02 July 2013 - 05:17 PM
I get it everytime i try to scan a new file..when i log out then back in it works..
#26
Posted 04 July 2013 - 03:31 PM
Within the next days you can expect a little update for the scanner.
Changes will include the following:
+ Antivirus versions page
95.88KB 0 downloads
+ AutoScan feature (re-scan a file automatically every 12 hours) (see attached image)
+ toggle admin on manage-users page
+ Maintenance mode and page
o performance improvementso put jQuery on server instead of google
o disabled refresh button whilst scanning (causes an error)
o fixed JavaScript error when scanning
- removed unnecessary table paddings
Suggestions for future changes are always welcome!
#27
Posted 07 July 2013 - 10:57 PM
We have successfully applied the update. Please feel free to test it. Especially the new AutoScan feature, because we ran into some difficulties there.
There are more changes to come (mostly performance optimizations), within the next days.
For suggestions or future changes please contact me or leave a post here.
#28
cryptotoad
Contributor
-
- Associate
-
-
Reputation: 43Fair
- 68 posts
Member
- LocationIn a code cave somewhere
Contributor
Posted 08 July 2013 - 12:18 AM
Minor scanner annoyance, sessions seem to be lost after only a couple minutes,which sometimes disconnects me before i can scan due to slow connection. Other than that this is awesome. Good work.
There's no such thing as a botnet, it's just cloud computing that someone installed backwards.
#29
Posted 08 July 2013 - 12:34 AM
Minor scanner annoyance, sessions seem to be lost after only a couple minutes,which sometimes disconnects me before i can scan due to slow connection. Other than that this is awesome. Good work.
Hummm does anyone else run into this problem? Because for me the sessions last as long as my browser is openend and I'm pretty sure we didn't set them to expire so fast. I'll have a look at that later to be sure though.
As a temporary solution you should use the 'remember me' checkbox when logging in, if you have no problem with cookies being set.
This problem was resolved.
#30
Posted 12 July 2013 - 10:11 AM
Small update:
+ prettier urls (restructure)
- got rid of unnecessary JavaScript in admin, user and scanner area
The update will be online within the next few hours. Excpect some more changes within the following days (mainly performance and usability improvements). And as always feel free to drop some suggestions if you have any.
#31
Posted 12 July 2013 - 10:50 AM
+ prettier urls (restructure)
- got rid of unnecessary JavaScript in admin, user and scanner area
The update will be online within the next few hours. Excpect some more changes within the following days (mainly performance and usability improvements). And as always feel free to drop some suggestions if you have any.
Would be nice if Auto-Scan would update its current scanreport instead of creating a new one and sending it over e-mail
#32
Posted 12 July 2013 - 11:30 AM
Would be nice if Auto-Scan would update its current scanreport instead of creating a new one and sending it over e-mail
yeah thats a pretty good idea indeed. I'll see if I can fit that into the next update.
#33
NiTrOwow
Contributor
-
- Administrators
-
-
Reputation: 486Very Good
- 1,096 posts
|MZ|(•̪̀●́)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿̿ ̿ ̿̿
- Locationsomewhere in Europe
Contributor
Posted 13 July 2013 - 10:37 AM
People please please keep in mind that BullDog and Ravage do make some changes/updates here and there to improve the scanner. It will or can be offline or unavailable some time, please keep an eye on this thread, if the scanner goes offline for a longer period of time Bulldog or Ravage will put that over here so you guys know that.
#34
alinh0
-
- Members
-
-
Reputation: 0Neutral
- 1 posts
Newbie
Posted 13 July 2013 - 01:19 PM
Can I have access to this scanner ? Pardon my post count XD
#35
Posted 13 July 2013 - 02:01 PM
Can I have access to this scanner ? Pardon my post count XD
Access is currently restricted to the following usergroups: Notorious, Associate, Binary Crew, Moderators and Administrators. So unfortunately you can't have access, yet.
We are still thinking about allowing access via request in the future (like it was handled on the old scanner), but we haven't decided on that yet. So stay tuned.
#36
Posted 13 July 2013 - 02:29 PM
Access is currently restricted to the following usergroups: Notorious, Associate, Binary Crew, Moderators and Administrators. So unfortunately you can't have access, yet.
We are still thinking about allowing access via request in the future (like it was handled on the old scanner), but we haven't decided on that yet. So stay tuned.
I think you should leave it as it is for now -
Notorious, Associate, Binary Crew, Moderators and Administrators, so only contributing members can have access to it.
#37
Posted 13 July 2013 - 02:56 PM
Yeah we definitely plan to keep it to contributing members only, but maybe allow everyone to request access and then let the community decide (via a poll), whether or not that person deserves access. That's how we did it on the old scanner and I think it worked pretty well.
#38
NiTrOwow
Contributor
-
- Administrators
-
-
Reputation: 486Very Good
- 1,096 posts
|MZ|(•̪̀●́)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿̿ ̿ ̿̿
- Locationsomewhere in Europe
Contributor
Posted 13 July 2013 - 07:49 PM
People are really not reading the rules at all. And we even don't have that much rules. Really a shame.
Next time if people with low post count ask question(s) that are answered in the rules they will get a 3 day ban from me.
Seriously they have 1 - 2 posts and the only thing they want to have is access to the scanner. They don't give a damn about the forums etc.
I have nothing to say topic related.
Simple as that.
#39
Posted 13 July 2013 - 09:19 PM
That's the way it usually is.Alot just come here looking for free crypters.They don't give 2 shits about the forum..If it was up to me there would be a post count minimum to access certain parts of the forum just for that reason.Of course this is just my opinion..They don't give a damn about the forums
#40
NiTrOwow
Contributor
-
- Administrators
-
-
Reputation: 486Very Good
- 1,096 posts
|MZ|(•̪̀●́)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿̿ ̿ ̿̿
- Locationsomewhere in Europe
Contributor
Posted 13 July 2013 - 10:31 PM
That's the way it usually is.Alot just come here looking for free crypters.They don't give 2 shits about the forum..If it was up to me there would be a post count minimum to access certain parts of the forum just for that reason.Of course this is just my opinion..
Yes i know but that would be unfair for legit members, Or members that come to learn and reply a few times only.
